Available on Amazon |
I'd like to welcome back Adam Gropper, founder of LegalJob.com and the author of “Making
Partner: The Essential Guide to Negotiating
the Law School Path and Beyond, for the second part of his two-part series. If you missed last week, check it out here! It's all yours, Adam!
This post continues to
elaborate on the three steps for discovering your dream legal job. The last post provided information on step
one, picking a law “major.” This post
discusses the second and third steps --
networking with a plan, and practicing persistence. These two steps will need to be practiced
twice -- once for discovering your dream job and again later when ultimately
looking to obtain that job.
Network (with a plan)
Lots of people emphasize
the importance of networking and the practice is crucial. However, you need a thoughtful plan for
reaching out to people who can actually help you achieve your objectives AND
for whom you can provide worthwhile ideas.
The key to this step is discussed
under the heading How
below.
Think of networking in
two bites. First, you will meet with
people to help you determine what type of law you want to practice. Later, you will meet with people who can be
help you obtain a job. There may be some
overlap but generally they are different people. The information below covers who, how, and
goals for networking with the purpose of discovering your dream job.
Who — Identify items you have in common with
alumni (touchpoints) such as same hometown, same undergraduate school, same
major, similar backgrounds, etc. and ask your Career Services Office (CSO) to
print out lists of these people who have agreed to be contacted. Focus on people that are doing something in
which you think you may be interested. So, if you have no interest in being a
prosecutor, do not reach out to that person even if you share lots of
touchpoints. Also reach out to
professors who teach a class in which you have excelled or at least one in
which you are interested. Professors can
be invaluable as far as contacts and helping you think through different
majors. A third group to reach out to
are lawyers at places in which you may want to work. For example, you attend a panel presentation
covering a practice area for which you have some interest and stick around after
to request a meeting with one of the panelists.
How — Channel your inner entrepreneur and think
about ideas that could help the people you have identified with similar
touchpoints. Be creative here. Perhaps you can help a specific
partner or associate alumni by providing
him or her an idea to write or speak about or some helpful advice regarding the
clients or industry he or she represents (i.e., what to advise client if a
pending case comes out adverse to the client’s or the industry’s interests). Dig deep such that you can really provide
some really valuable ideas to the person.
Ask professors, CSO folks, or others for help brainstorming.
Once you have three or
four ideas, e-mail the person with two of them and request to meet for coffee
to discuss your other ideas and learn about their career path. The request to meet should be for coffee and
not lunch which is much more time consuming.
Do not put a time limit because not much can be accomplished in five,
ten or fifteen minutes but saying coffee at least gives a hint that the meeting
will be brief. Most important, state
upfront that you are not looking for a job.
That statement is true and it will put people that are not hiring at
ease and make them more likely to respond.
Goals — The two most important goals when
networking are: i) to listen (more than
talk), and ii) to obtain additional contacts.
One of the most
helpful items you can learn about at these meetings is the decision making
process that led them to that practice area and place. You may not want to be a tax lawyer but their
thought process of how they ended up choosing tax could help you decide you
want to be a securities major. Ask for
permission to keep in touch with the person and update them on your progress. If they are open to the idea, you have a
future contact for your next round of networking (when looking for a job). Also, ask the person for the names and contact
information of two people they think may be helpful for you to contact. Thus, even if the current meeting is not
going well, one of that person’s contacts may end up being the most helpful
person you meet.
Practice persistence
This part may sound
cliché, but it is the most important. To
be successful both in discovering your dream job and eventually obtaining a
job, it is helpful to have the long view.
The entire process has ups and downs but if you put in the necessary
time, you will generate strong results in the long run. There are at least two ways you can practice
persistence for purposes of determining what type of law you want to practice. First, be rigorous in your networking
scope. Starting with the CSO lists, plan
to target 30 or more people and know that lots of people will not respond or
will not be willing to meet no matter how strong your free ideas. No problem.
Keep at it until you have a decent size list of people (say 5-10 people)
that are willing to meet to discuss your ideas for them and their career path. In other words, try again if you do not hear
back from someone the first time. What
is the harm? Second, once you meet with
these people, follow-up with them from time to time (if they gave you
permission to keep in touch in response to your request) and make sure to
follow through and contact the people whom they recommended you contact.
* *
* * *
* *
About the author:
Adam
Gropper is the founder of LegalJob.com, a
website that provides practical advice for law school students and law firm
associates. Adam is also the author of “Making
Partner: The Essential Guide to
Negotiating the Law School Path and Beyond,” recently published by the
American Bar Association.
Adam
is a Legislation Counsel on the staff of the non-partisan Congressional Joint
Committee on Taxation, assisting Congress in developing and drafting tax
legislation and legislative history.
Previously, Adam was a tax partner at Baker & Hostetler LLP where he
spent ten years handling tax controversy and planning matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment